William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
GOOD RIDDANCE – AT 10:57 A.M. ET: In an otherwise reasonably reported story, The Politico makes a vocabulary error that is all too frequent in the mainstream media – the use of the term "anti-war" when a bit more detail is required:
There is no "anti-war" movement, any more than there was during Vietnam. The movement in that war was an anti-draft movement, at best. And part of it was a "movement" by the old left, which was anti any war that America had a chance of winning. Today's "anti-war" movement is pretty much the same. It ignores ghastly conflicts and horrible oppression to oppose any military action by the United States.
Influential? Who do they influence?
Code Pink is a hard-left joke. Its leaders were recently in the Mideast, ginning up anti-Israel activism. We've had, for half a century, these myths about "anti-war" groups. They did enormous damage to our effort in Vietnam – a fact confirmed in North Vietnam's official history of the war. Ever since the so-called "McCarthy era," mainstream journalists have been reluctant to call Marxists what they really are, and so a massive distortion of reality has occurred in the press. The story goes on to quote the laments of one Leslie Cagan, another "anti-war" activist, and founder of "United for Peace and Justice." The left loves labels like that. Leslie Kagan is another anti-American activist who sells herself as "anti-war." These groups serve no useful purpose. They surround a big lie, and, sadly, the mainstream media has gone along with the fib. September 5, 2010 |
|